Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago,

User Stats

8
Posts
0
Votes
Eugenio G.
  • Boulder Creek, CA
0
Votes |
8
Posts

Steep creek access and liability

Eugenio G.
  • Boulder Creek, CA
Posted

We are closing on an SFH / Mountain Cottage with a steep dirt slope access to a creek from an old landing point.

We are considering building out stairs down to the creek to reduce the risk of falling down the slope. I'm concerned this might actually increase liability.

The property is in California and I understand that the attractive nuisance doctrine no longer applies and that I now have a general duty to keep their property in a reasonably safe condition. We think that building out steps with a handrail does this. I'm not looking for legal advice, but would like to hear from other's experience and thoughts? Are we missing anything? What else should we consider?