Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 11 months ago, 01/21/2024

User Stats

78
Posts
33
Votes
Amir Navabpour
  • Investor
  • Campbell, CA
33
Votes |
78
Posts

Cost and effectiveness of jetting Sewer pipes w/ Root X

Amir Navabpour
  • Investor
  • Campbell, CA
Posted

I have a rental that has had 3-4 backups.  They augered it and found signifant roots each time.  I am trying to think of the most cost effective way to deal with this to prevent fututre back ups.  I have seen quotes anywhere from 150-700 for jetting sewer pipes w/ Root X which seems like a very wide swing.  I almost wonder if there is a spectrum of services I am not aware of.   If you've done this, in your experience was this an effective treatment, to at least buy a few years?  Is there a cost effective way to deal with the root (pun intended) of this issue? 

Loading replies...