Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Dallas, TX
744
Votes |
4,988
Posts

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,409
Posts
2,885
Votes
Bill S.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
2,885
Votes |
4,409
Posts
Bill S.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
ModeratorReplied

This is in no way justified. It really wasn't a landlord situation. They were speculators who acquired tenants and the tenants were in the way of their plan. The reason the tenants were in the way was rent control. Basically, the owners couldn't raise rents to market on current tenants (making the building worth much less as an investment) and the tenants wouldn't leave so they could make the building a condo complex. They resorted to criminal activity in an effort to get the tenants to move. Really no different that the other victims of criminal activity.

  • Bill S.
  • Loading replies...