General Landlording & Rental Properties
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
1031 Exchanges
presented by
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 2 years ago,
Sell or Keep House for SFH Rental
Hey folks!
I'm interested in opinions from other investors in the Seattle/Eastside area on my current situation. I listed my house for sale in the Snoqualmie, WA 2 months ago (essentially the worst timing) and while it has had some showings, there have been no offers while we have steadily decreased the price over $200k. This has led me to the point of wondering if I could instead turn the property into a SFH long-term rental instead. It's a 3bed 2.5 bath, roughly 2,400 sq ft and in great shape. I believe it was even being used as a rental for a few years prior to me purchasing it and living here the last two years.
My main question is: Between the risk of not selling the house and having to sit and eat the cost of the mortgage for months (I've already moved elsewhere) or renting out the house and breaking even or going $100-$200 in the red, which would you choose? I'm sure from an investment standpoint neither option is amazing, but the silver lining on renting is the idea that maybe 5 years from now prices have gone back up and I can sell for more. Any thoughts or input are appreciated!
I'm interested in opinions from other investors in the Seattle/Eastside area on my current situation. I listed my house for sale in the Snoqualmie, WA 2 months ago (essentially the worst timing) and while it has had some showings, there have been no offers while we have steadily decreased the price over $200k. This has led me to the point of wondering if I could instead turn the property into a SFH long-term rental instead. It's a 3bed 2.5 bath, roughly 2,400 sq ft and in great shape. I believe it was even being used as a rental for a few years prior to me purchasing it and living here the last two years.
My main question is: Between the risk of not selling the house and having to sit and eat the cost of the mortgage for months (I've already moved elsewhere) or renting out the house and breaking even or going $100-$200 in the red, which would you choose? I'm sure from an investment standpoint neither option is amazing, but the silver lining on renting is the idea that maybe 5 years from now prices have gone back up and I can sell for more. Any thoughts or input are appreciated!