Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 11 years ago, 10/23/2013

User Stats

231
Posts
260
Votes
Matt Mason
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
260
Votes |
231
Posts

Flood Insurance Story

Matt Mason
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I have a story with flood insurance that I wanted to share as I thought it may help someone out there.

A couple years ago I was in escrow on a 4-plex and the bank doing my loan said I needed flood insurance since my property was in a flood zone. This surprised me since the property was not near any creeks or mountains and is even in a little bit of a hilly area and it is not at the lowest elevation. I looked at the flood zone maps and indeed my side of the street was in the zone. For basic flood insurance that would satisfy the lender, I was quoted over $2,000. This is something I would have to pay year after year and would have probably torpedeod the deal in my eyes (this was a short sale and I going back to the bank for a big reduction for this would have been difficult at best)

Looking at the property, the map made no sense to me, since my neighbors property behind me was about 5 feet lower than this property. The only way this could flood is if a wall of water came rushing in, because it would pool in lower elevations. Also, the prop. had a raised foundation so if anything could get flooded it would be the crawl space. I asked if the seller was paying this flood insurance and yes they were paying over $2k per year. I was pretty upset as it is not easy to find properties here and I was potentially going to lose this over what I thought was a useless flood insurance requirement.

I called the insurance company and told them the facts and finally did get them to acknowledge if there were flood vents in the crawl space I could get a reduced rate since the crawl space was higher than the 2 foot flood zone listed on the map. The property didn't have flood vents, but it did have a lot of vents. I called back and asked about this and yes, they did grant the reduction if the total size of the vents met a certain requirement. I measured and was just short, but found out the rate would be reduced from over $2k to $250.

I ended up closing on the property and had the $2k sent in for the premium as part of escrow as the bank required, but had another vent installed a few days after close. Took pictures and sent all the measurements back to the insurance company and they granted me the refund and the overall reduction in rates a few days later.

Point is I never would have known if I didn't investigate and since the prior owner had no knowledge of this I am sure there are other owners out there with the same issue that could get quite a benefit. $2k a year is a big deal.

Loading replies...