Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Personal Finance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago,

User Stats

295
Posts
75
Votes
Leland S.
  • Developer
  • LA, Nashville TN
75
Votes |
295
Posts

Solo 401k funding, payroll tax tradeoff of single member LLC

Leland S.
  • Developer
  • LA, Nashville TN
Posted

Looking for some second opinions on anyone who is "self employed" and has a Solo 401k. Probably folks here know about check book 401k's and such to invest in real estate. 

I am now in a contract position as 1099 and have the option to fund my own Solo 401k up to 55k, which is amazingly awesome compared to most employers just providing the individual limit. 

The gotchya is that they limit employer funding to 25% of the income, which means, to meet the 55k limit you have to exceed the FICA income limit (go figure) and pay maximum payroll taxes. 

I did a spreadsheet calculation of the difference between paying myself 80k (and funding 25% to 401k to make 100k income) (the low end of a reasonable salary for my job) and the salary to achieve maximum funding of 55k (146k). So assuming the business is making net at least 146k, how much is the difference when you adjust the salary across income tax to owner distribution at the 21% rate. 

The result is below. It shows I gain $16,500 in my 401k at the cost of $8569 to the tax man. I really don't think this is that bad. It means I get almost twice the amount of tax protected money per tax dollar handed over. (My Tax state is Arizona).

Then I assumed a return on investment of 12%. So for each dollar saved in taxes by not increasing salary, I assumed earned 12% starting year 1, reinvesting each year those earnings, and the same on the 401k money. 

The result there is that the 401k additional funds can become $120k value in 5 year at 12% return, just interest is 37.5k. The cash saved by not contributing to 401k can only become 62k (and that is without the capital gains taxes considered).  

So by paying the full amount to fund the 401k you end up with extra 18k of interest that is tax free in your retirement account compared to having the cash. Even at 5% ROI, it still appears better.

What do you guys think? 

ROI Expected 12%
401k delta $ 16,500
Income Forfeited $ 8,569 Income Int (Cash) Delta (401k - Cash) Per Year
5 yr interest $ 37,459 (401k) $ 19,454 $ 18,006 $ 3,601
5 yr value $ 119,959 (401k) $ 62,299 $ 57,661 $ 11,532 

ROI Expected 5%
401k delta $ 16,500
Income Forfeited $ 8,569 Income Int Delta Per Year
5 yr interest $ 13,591 $ 7,058 $ 6,533 $ 1,307
5 yr value $ 96,091 $ 49,903 $ 46,188 $ 9,238 

Loading replies...