Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Personal Finance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago,

User Stats

59
Posts
100
Votes
Brady Mullen
Pro Member
  • Denver, CO
100
Votes |
59
Posts

A Balanced Approach

Brady Mullen
Pro Member
  • Denver, CO
Posted

I've been thinking this weekend about something I heard someone say about the cost of something over time.

It was something about purchasing a home with a mortgage, and having the total amount of money paid for that home over the life of the mortgage equal to more than 2.5 TIMES the so-called purchase price.

This is a fundamental (and common) mistake about how money works.

That's like saying that the dinner with my spouse didn't cost $100, but $2,000 because if I invested that money at 10% annually, compounded monthly for 30 years, it would be worth $2,000.

While it's true that spending money now that isn't necessary, means the forfeiting of some larger value in the future. But it's not the right kind of "true" that helps me navigate through life well.

I want to have dinners out with my spouse from time to time. I want to experience all sorts of things that wouldn't be considered "necessary". Also, my objective isn't to be the wealthiest guy in the graveyard.

One of my favorite books about personal finance is "The Richest Man in Babylon". It's about 100 years old, and it's as artistically written as it is helpful. While it may be a little simplistic for today's modern financial systems, it has the right idea about balancing the future and the present.

It promotes devoting a portion of your income for later and spending the rest in the present.

We are not guaranteed to experience the future anyway, so the present must have some value.

The point of all this is that extremes and ideologies are tempting, but they are ultimately dangerous dogmas. Living only for the moment is not wise, but neither is living like Ebeneezer Scrooge because it's what's best for your wealth.

Abiding by such ideologies swaps the role of master and servant played by you and your money. A balanced approach of living well and saving for the future is the key to maximizing the life experience.

  • Brady Mullen