Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Personal Finance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago,

User Stats

8
Posts
4
Votes
Andrew M.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Chicago
4
Votes |
8
Posts

Section 179 Write Off (Vehicle over 6,000 pounds)

Andrew M.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Chicago
Posted

How can I take advantage of this write-off? 

Some background information on my situation. I recently set up an LLC for the purpose of transferring my rental properties to it. Currently, my personal residence and investment property is under my personal name. I'm looking into purchasing a pick-up that is over 6 thousand pounds. It will be used for both personal use and managing my property. What do I need to do to take advantage of this write-off? Here are a couple questions?

- Do I need to purchase the vehicle under my LLC name?

- Do I need to purchase commercial vehicle insurance?


Am I thinking this is too good to be true, or is this actually viable? 

Loading replies...