Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Classifieds
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 month ago on .

User Stats

71
Posts
9
Votes
Felicia Nitu
  • Specialist
  • San Francisco, CA
9
Votes |
71
Posts

Building an ADU might be a better choice than a lot split to build one unit under SB-

Felicia Nitu
  • Specialist
  • San Francisco, CA
Posted

Why?

San Diego's SB-9 requires homeowners to live on the property for at least 3 years after an urban lot split, unless they qualify for an exemption.

If you're an investor or a homeowner looking for flexibility, this rule could LIMIT your ability to sell or rent out the new units right away.

To move forward with a lot split, homeowners must sign an affidavit stating they will live in one of the units as their primary residence.

The only EXCEPTIONS? Community land trusts and qualified nonprofit corporations, which can split and sell without living on-site.