Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago,

User Stats

12
Posts
1
Votes
Brooke T.
  • Boise
1
Votes |
12
Posts

Title insurance lawsuits... can be retroactive?

Brooke T.
  • Boise
Posted

Hello Everyone,

I'm struggling to find a title agency to insure my seller carry back on a property I secured out of HOA foreclosure, but I know its just a matter of finding the right investor friendly company.

Through this process and talking with several different companies, I've been told more than once that the reason they don't insure HOA or Tax lien properties is because the owner could sue them over being foreclosed on due to this; as its 'not fair they lost their property due to such a small amount'.

Has anyone ever heard of anything like this before?? I don't understand how a title company can be held responsible for anything that happens after the policy, as it insures from the time it is purchased and any defects prior. I was told by one of the escrow officers that this was a big problem back in 2008, but am skeptical, as to me it makes no sense,.. any experience with this anyone?

Loading replies...