Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on .

User Stats

50
Posts
34
Votes
James Elden
34
Votes |
50
Posts

Are some states less risky to own property without LLC?

James Elden
Posted

I'm a first time real estate investor looking mainly in southeastern states to invest in single family homes and I definitely like the idea of owning a property in an LLC but this seems to present a lot of hurdles to getting a loan. I am originally from California which has a pervasive lawsuit culture and would never invest in California so maybe I'm over-estimating how much I need an LLC in a more business-friendly southern state but I am not sure on this as I'm not a lawyer. I'm wondering if anyone has general advice as far as whether it is less necessary in some states to have an LLC compared to others?