Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

15
Posts
10
Votes
Martin Pulrang
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Eden Prairie, MN
10
Votes |
15
Posts

Tax implications of a joint Letters of Administration

Martin Pulrang
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Eden Prairie, MN
Posted

I am hopeful this community can guide me. I am listed as personal representative, with my father, on a Letters of Administration (LA) as a result of the death of my uncle. My lawyer said we could execute a deed of distribution directly into my LLC without any immediate tax implications as the value of the property is on the low side. My accountant said my father and I are half owners as we are both listed on the LA and as such there would be taxation on half the value of the home. I intend to update this property and make it my first rental property. I don't want to start off on the wrong foot. Who is right?

  • Martin Pulrang
  • Loading replies...