Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago,

User Stats

56
Posts
7
Votes
Matthew Hicks
  • Investor
  • Pittsburgh, PA
7
Votes |
56
Posts

Challenging Assessed Tax Value

Matthew Hicks
  • Investor
  • Pittsburgh, PA
Posted

Hi Everyone,

I've read on here before that many investors will challenge the assessed value of their investment properties at all times. I get the logic given how high taxes can be compared to the cost of challenging.

So here's my question. I bought a house that was condemned and fully rehabbed it and then rented it out. Its probably worth $220-$230k and I have $185k all in invested into it. The assessed value was just increased to $150k from $50k. Given that the assessment is still way under value, should I bother challenging the assessment?

Anyone with specific experience in this area in the Pittsburgh area specifically would be particularly useful.

Loading replies...