Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

8,666
Posts
4,014
Votes
Jon Klaus
  • Developer
  • Garland, TX
4,014
Votes |
8,666
Posts

Managing properties held by your self-directed IRA

Jon Klaus
  • Developer
  • Garland, TX
Posted

Can you manage properties held by your self-directed IRA? Assuming you do none of the hands on work? Same question for managing the rehab.

What if your SD IRA owns part of the property but you provide property management? Again, doing no hands on work yourself?

Example: your SD IRA buys 33% of a property via a JV. You oversee the rehab, lease up, and ongoing management? Kosher? If not, what are some ways to make it work?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

15,749
Posts
10,947
Votes
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
10,947
Votes |
15,749
Posts
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
ModeratorReplied

Jon, I would check with the IRS on this but my take would be no and here is why. You are a disqualified party to your IRA as is any entity you own with a 50% or more interest. If your IRA owned 33% and you partnered with your IRA (which can be done but tricky) taking the balance ownership, I believe the IRS would look at that deal as the IRA owner benefiting and thus not allowed, however, I could be wrong on this so I would definately check into it.

Even if the IRS gave the green light, I would be shy on doing deals like this as it comes to close to the gray areas and IRA funds are not worth risking when you can make money without the very same risk and problems. That is my take on it.

Loading replies...