Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . presented by

User Stats

25
Posts
11
Votes
Wells Mangrum
  • Investor
  • Eau Claire, WI
11
Votes |
25
Posts

Qualified Opportunity Fund Property used as collateral

Wells Mangrum
  • Investor
  • Eau Claire, WI
Posted

I have $600,000 of capital gains from the sale of stock. This spring, I plan on purchasing land in a Qualified Opportunity Zone and building a multifamily apartment complex. Construction costs are planned to be $600,000. So my capital gains perfectly matches acquisition and construction costs.

Once the complex is fully built and operating, can I use the property as collateral for a loan to purchase a property not in a Qualified Opportunity Zone? Or is that a violation of the 90% rule?

For example, after construction I want to increase my use of OPM. So I go to the bank asking for a loan of $400,000 using the completely paid off QOZ property as collateral. I then use the $400,000 in a separate LLC as down payment on a $2,000,000 McDonalds in a non-QOZ area. Does that violate the 90% rule?

My gut feeling is yes but I would like to be certain.

Thanks!