Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
4
Votes
Heidi Kloeer
4
Votes |
3
Posts

Pottstown PA rental inspection lawsuit - big win for renters

Heidi Kloeer
Posted

I was asked to post this for a member of the local landlord group.  More to follow soon:


Pottstown, Penn.—This morning, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued an opinion
vacating and remanding a lower court’s ruling in favor of Pottstown in a
lawsuit challenging the borough’s rental inspection ordinance. This law
allows the borough to enter residents’ homes without cause and without
the residents’ consent. The Court also reversed the trial court’s orders
denying discovery to the Pottstown residents who challenged the law.
This makes sure that as the lawsuit now proceeds on remand, the
residents will have a full record of how these inspections are actually
conducted—and what inspectors actually do once they are inside peoples’
homes.

The Court also rejected the borough’s argument that, in order for the
tenants to challenge the law, residents would have to first submit to
the borough’s invasive rental inspections. After Pottstown tenants
Dottie and Omar Rivera and their longtime landlord, Steve Camburn,
refused to allow inspectors inside their home, Pottstown obtained
administrative warrants to search inside—but with no suspicion that
anything was wrong. The Borough also attempted to search the non-rental
family home of Pottstown residents Thomas, Kathleen, and Rosemarie
O’Connor without their consent and with no search warrant whatsoever.
These brave citizens sued Pottstown with the help of the Institute for Justice (IJ).

“To require Tenants to endure the inspections before challenging the
inspection requirement would render Tenants’ Article I, Section 8
privacy rights illusory,” the Court declared.

“We are thrilled that the Commonwealth Court has recognized the
Pennsylvania Constitution’s strong protections of property rights,” IJ
Attorney Rob Peccola said. “Pottstown’s rental inspections regime is a
way to get around constitutional protections for privacy rights, and we
look forward to litigating this case based on the facts on the ground.”

After the Pottstown residents compile a full record, there will be a
decision on the merits at the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas.
This ruling could ensure that every Pennsylvanian who resists a search
of their home can only have the government enter with a warrant
supported by probable cause that something is wrong inside.

Loading replies...