Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

22
Posts
4
Votes
Tony Rodriguez
4
Votes |
22
Posts

Legal Description Abbreviations Potential Issue Chicago Cook Co

Tony Rodriguez
Posted

Hello all, I'm in the process on closing on a property located in Chicago and the title commitment has the legal description of the property as ... PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK CO ILLINOIS. but the current recorded deed has the description as ... PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS.

So the word COUNTY has been abbreviated to CO in the title commitment I'm supposed to sign, my lawyer says it should be OK but I'm not so sure, I have yet to find a deed in cook county that abbreviates the word cook. I'm I being too picky or can this be a potential issue when I sell the house?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

16,433
Posts
12,718
Votes
Ned Carey
  • Investor
  • Baltimore, MD
12,718
Votes |
16,433
Posts
Ned Carey
  • Investor
  • Baltimore, MD
ModeratorReplied

@Tony Rodriguez I don't think it would be an issue. Given the context of both the hud, sales contract, and the title commitment, it should be clear that the property they intend to insure is the property you are buying. Is there another description like tax ID number.

Remember this is a contract between you and the title insurer. I don't think a judge is going to say that because the insurers agent, the title company, abbreviated the word county, that it is clear they intended to insure a different property. Especially when no other property has that legal description and given the context of the HUD-1 and settlement.

  • Ned Carey
  • Loading replies...