Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago,

User Stats

21
Posts
1
Votes
Brent Crude
1
Votes |
21
Posts

Holding LLC Does It Look Like A Sham ?

Brent Crude
Posted

I've set up a Wyoming LLC that will be THE Member of a California LLC (yet to be set up),

The California LLC will have a rental property, with income and expenses like a regular business,

OK, so California LLC looks legitimate, but what about the Wyoming LLC that is only a holding company and sole member of the

California LLC, so the Wyoming LLC in reality does no business and is only used for asset protection, Im just wondering if its not doing any actual business isn't there a possibility of being called a shame LLC ?

Happy Friday the 13 Th

Loading replies...