Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

6
Posts
1
Votes
David Beadles
  • Pasadena, CA
1
Votes |
6
Posts

Section 121 Exclusion for a Duplex when Occupying Both Units

David Beadles
  • Pasadena, CA
Posted

Currently, my mother-in-law lives with me and I claim her on my tax return. I am considering purchasing a duplex where my wife and I live in one side and my mother-in-law lives in the other. 

If I decide to sell in 2 years, does the entire property qualify for the Sec. 121 exclusion since I'm not renting it and my dependent occupies the other side?

  • David Beadles
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    1,982
    Posts
    1,764
    Votes
    Eamonn McElroy#5 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
    • Accountant
    • Atlanta, GA
    1,764
    Votes |
    1,982
    Posts
    Eamonn McElroy#5 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
    • Accountant
    • Atlanta, GA
    Replied

    @David Beadles

    Not impossible by a long shot.

    Your tax pro should be discussing the Bentsion Cohen case (2014) with you.  They lost, but it gives valuable insight into how the courts examine the issue, for which the court admitted this particular issue is a gray area not examined by the code and/or regs.  It's purely a facts and circumstances based analysis.

    Loading replies...