Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6
Posts
1
Votes
David Beadles
  • Pasadena, CA
1
Votes |
6
Posts

Section 121 Exclusion for a Duplex when Occupying Both Units

David Beadles
  • Pasadena, CA
Posted

Currently, my mother-in-law lives with me and I claim her on my tax return. I am considering purchasing a duplex where my wife and I live in one side and my mother-in-law lives in the other. 

If I decide to sell in 2 years, does the entire property qualify for the Sec. 121 exclusion since I'm not renting it and my dependent occupies the other side?

  • David Beadles
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    1,982
    Posts
    1,762
    Votes
    Eamonn McElroy#5 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
    • Accountant
    • Atlanta, GA
    1,762
    Votes |
    1,982
    Posts
    Eamonn McElroy#5 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
    • Accountant
    • Atlanta, GA
    Replied

    @David Beadles

    Not impossible by a long shot.

    Your tax pro should be discussing the Bentsion Cohen case (2014) with you.  They lost, but it gives valuable insight into how the courts examine the issue, for which the court admitted this particular issue is a gray area not examined by the code and/or regs.  It's purely a facts and circumstances based analysis.

    Loading replies...