Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 13 years ago,

User Stats

8,794
Posts
4,382
Votes
Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
4,382
Votes |
8,794
Posts

Hard Money Loans - Usury Dodge With Choice Of Law Provision

Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
Posted

Okay hard money pros...

Scenario:
-A fully licensed real estate (deeds...not money) broker in California wishes to make hard money loans at very high interest rates in trade for aggregating money sources for fix-and-flippers and providing the fund apparatus where they can pool investors' money

-The broker/lender inserts a choice of law provision in the contract stating that the laws of California apply

-The broker/lender loans on projects in other states

I read in other posts that people have received advice from attorneys stating that the choice of law provision somehow "imports" the rules of Cali and allows one to lend at usurious rates.

Thoughts? Comments? Are there other things that need to be considered to determine where the business really transacted? Or does the choice of law trump case law type rules?

Loading replies...