Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

20
Posts
11
Votes
Brad Cornell
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northfield, MN
11
Votes |
20
Posts

SEC Regulations When Working With Partners

Brad Cornell
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northfield, MN
Posted

Hey All!

My wife and I became RE investors last June when we bought a 4-unit that we are house hacking. Since then I’ve been hunting for more deals like a mad man and educating myself through books, BP, and meetups.  We’re now walking down the path of working with investors to do more and bigger deals. We’ve built a decent size network of investors and have about 500K available to work with at the moment with more available once we prove the concept. We’ve learned a ton moving this direction but I seem to be hitting a few roadblocks that I was hoping you all could help me with. 

Here's the scenario- I have four investors that I have previous relationships with, some friends and some family.  They see that I'm doing well with small multi-family investing and have said "if you find a good deal let me know and I'd love to invest."  They are looking for 3-7 year commitments and want ownership stake in the properties.  I would be the deal provider and manage the day to day operations and any rehab as well as tenant management while they would basically just inject cash.  We're looking to mostly do small to medium sized multi's for now.

The question is this, do I need to file with the SEC or is there a way to legitimately do it without the deal being a security?  I've heard several different thoughts and ideas about this entire thing, I've ready "Raising Private Capital by Matt Faircloth," scoured the forms and watched a lot of YouTube videos, but haven't gotten very far.  I'm hoping you amazing people can shed some light with your experience.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

55
Posts
83
Votes
Mauricio Rauld
  • Syndication Attorney in Newport Beach, CA
83
Votes |
55
Posts
Mauricio Rauld
  • Syndication Attorney in Newport Beach, CA
Replied

Hey Brad-  I am a syndication attorney.  Anytime you take money from investors where the returns are generated by your efforts (in other words, investors are passive and you do the work) then you are dealing with a security and must comply with both federal and state securities laws. This basically means you need to register the security/syndication with the SEC, or find an exception to registration.  Most people find an exemption and you will likely qualify (based on your email) for a Reg D, 506B b exemption.  

The only way to keep out of being considered a security is if all of you are actively involved in the deal and ideally, all co-managers of the LLC. Although with 5 of you, that might be a hard sell. Usually this works if you have 1 or 2 other investors and all of you put money in the deal and actively participate.

It will be your burden to prove to the SEC that your other partners are actively involved.

Hope this helps.

Mauricio

Loading replies...