Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

16,121
Posts
5,816
Votes
Joshua Dorkin
#2 Questions About BiggerPockets & Official Site Announcements Contributor
  • BiggerPockets Founder
  • Maui, HI
5,816
Votes |
16,121
Posts

E-Mails Legally Binding According to NY Court: Naldi v Grunberg

Joshua Dorkin
#2 Questions About BiggerPockets & Official Site Announcements Contributor
  • BiggerPockets Founder
  • Maui, HI
Posted

If you negotiate real estate deals via email, be aware that “handwriting and email should now basically be considered one and the same," as a result of the Naldi v Grunberg case. E-mails may become legally binding in real estate transactions, if contract terms were offered within those messages, according to a New York court ruling.

According to MortgageLoan:

Naldi vs. Grunberg, involves an Italian national who made an offer of $50 million to buy two Manhattan apartment buildings. The owner responded with an email in which he accepted the offer, pending completion of a contract, and offered Robert Naldi – the buyer – the right of first refusal if a better offer came along.

The properties were subsequently sold to another buyer for $52 million and Naldi sued, claiming his right of first refusal was violated.

The status of e-mail agreements hinges in large part upon whether an agreement has been reached; several attorneys told the Times the ruling could be circumvented by attaching a disclaimer to e-mails saying no deal is final until a contract is signed.

For more info, read:
- Naldi v Grunberg
- Real Estate Update: New York Appellate Court Concludes E-Mail Satisfies Writing Requirement
- E-Mail May Be Binding, State Court Rules - NY Times

Loading replies...