Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

80
Posts
23
Votes
Stephen R.
  • Investor
  • NEWTOWN, CT
23
Votes |
80
Posts

Partnering solo 401k with Hard Money and prohibited transactions

Stephen R.
  • Investor
  • NEWTOWN, CT
Posted

I'm looking to partially fund a fix and flip using money from a self-directed solo 401k. My thought is to purchase the property using hard money and then fund the rehab, which exceeds the purchase price and current value, using the solo 401k.

1. If I used personal funds to make the down payment and pay closing costs, would it then become a prohibited transaction because of commingling? Would I have to use funds from the 401k to fund the down payment and closing costs as well? Could I use private money to cover those costs? Could I use funds from my corporation?

2. Since the hard money lender will require me to personally guarantee the loan, will that make it a prohibited transaction? Or do I only have to offer the solo 401k loan as non-recourse? 

3. Can the property still act as collateral to the non-recourse 401k loan if the hard money lender holds a first lien position? 

4. If it is possible, how would I structure the deal? How is title held? 

5. Although it would not be possible given the circumstance of this transaction, would a better partnership be to fund the purchase completely with the solo 401k and fund the rehab, either in total or in part, with hard or private money?

6. As a licensed agent would I be prohibited from acting as the agent on either the purchase or the final sale of the property? Would that make it a prohibited transaction because I "personally benefit?" What if I handled the transaction but didn't accept a commission?


Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,409
Posts
857
Votes
Daniel Dietz
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Reedsburg, WI
857
Votes |
1,409
Posts
Daniel Dietz
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Reedsburg, WI
Replied

I thin @Dmitriy Fomichenko is on the right track of how things would need to work. 

We have done a similar deal with a Private Lender (a friend, not a full time professional) Our Solo401K bought the property with 'cash', and the 'fix up' funds were essentially a first position loan on that property, but that loan was to the SOLO401K, NOT to us (there are 3 partners, all SOLO401Ks) and there was no personal gaurantees and no other 'recourse'. The Private Lender was comfortable with this as his loan as less that 50% LTV and he knows our past history and performance.

Admittedly, it would most likely be hard to find that same type of lender for most people, but a possibility. 

I hope I explained that right. 

Dan Dietz

  • Daniel Dietz
  • [email protected]
  • 608-524-4899
  • Loading replies...