Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

24
Posts
3
Votes
Rudy Duran
  • Seattle, Wa
3
Votes |
24
Posts

California Full time real estate professional losses limit

Rudy Duran
  • Seattle, Wa
Posted

Federal taxes, you're allowed to deduct $25,000 of passive real estate losses against your active income eg w2 income that you actively participate.  They phase out this deduction starting at 100k agi.  However, if you are full time real estate professional you can bypass this limit.

Does this work the same for Californian income taxes?

I'm using turbo tax.  my spouse federal w2 income approx 155k.  but since i'm full time RE pro, i bypass the limit and took 56k in losses according to schdule E.  On my california return, my modified agi is 155k again (pulled from a federal worksheet).  California says since it's over 150k, i get 0 losses against my active income.

Did i mess up, or does fed just allow 55k loss while california allows 0?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

24
Posts
3
Votes
Rudy Duran
  • Seattle, Wa
3
Votes |
24
Posts
Rudy Duran
  • Seattle, Wa
Replied

ok, so full time RE pro only works for federal purposes.  

Beginning in 1994, and for federal purposes only, rental real estate activities performed by qualified real estate professionals are not automatically treated as passive activities. California does not conform to this provision. Therefore, for California purposes allrental activities are considered passive activities.

Loading replies...