Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
2
Votes
Sara Erickson
  • Saint Paul, MN
2
Votes |
2
Posts

Short term rental depreciation

Sara Erickson
  • Saint Paul, MN
Posted

I'm wondering if a non-owner occupied short term rental (Air BnB) should have a depreciation term of 27.5 years  (residential rental building) or 39 years (commercial rental)? I own 2 small single family homes which are rented exclusively as Air BnBs.  I read the Air BnB official tax manual written by Ernst & Young which says that 27.5 year depreciation is appropriate, but my accountant disagrees. 

This is his reply to my email:

"I read most of what E&Y has to say, and I agree with all of this, including the 27.5 yr life for ‘residential rental buildings’.

But I do think you could be challenged for buildings that are used exclusively for short term rentals. For example in your situation, you do not use the structure as any part of your personal residence, so I do not think this is truly classified as residential rental, I think it is commercial rental."

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,264
Posts
977
Votes
Logan Allec
  • Accountant
  • Los Angeles, CA
977
Votes |
1,264
Posts
Logan Allec
  • Accountant
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

@Natalie Kolodij and @Jake Hottenrott, the issue here is that if a property's average period of customer use is 7 days or less (as many if not most Airbnbs are though I'm not sure about @Sara Erickson's case), it's not considered a rental activity under Reg §1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii)(A) and therefore would not be depreciated under 27.5 years, which is reserved for residential rental property under §168.

That being said, the scope of Reg §1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii) limits the scope of Reg §1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii)(A) to the 7-day-or-less rule to Reg §1.469-1T(e)(3), not §168 and not the entire IRC.

And of course the regs for the 7-day-or-less rule are temporary regs issued in 2002, and the shelf life on temporary regs is 3 years.

But nevertheless these regs probably give some insight into Treasury's thought process here.

Speaking of which...Airbnb wasn't a thing in 2002, and Treasury's presumption back then may have been that the "rental" of a property with an average period of customer use of 7 days or less would likely have been bundled with some significant services, thus making the entire activity a trade or business rather than a rental.

But things are different now, though obviously some services are provided with the typical Airbnb (e.g., the provision of clean sheets, television, complimentary snacks, etc.) that aren't provided in the typical rental...

What do I do?  Absent specific, current guidance on this point, I figure out what's best for my clients, let them know which is best, let them know what guidance we have, and let them make the decision.  This goes for 27.5-yr vs 39-yr as well as Sch C vs Sch E for properties with average use of 7 days or less, such as most Airbnb properties.

Anyway this is my thought process, thinking not so much from a this-is-the-law standpoint (because I do think that this is still a grey area) but from a risk-mitigation standpoint, and I know other tax professionals approach this issue differently, so I welcome others' insights into this issue and my thought process.

Loading replies...