Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

92
Posts
43
Votes
Anthony Conway
  • Investor
  • Charleston, SC
43
Votes |
92
Posts

Heavy expenses or heavy depreciation what looks better?

Anthony Conway
  • Investor
  • Charleston, SC
Posted
So getting ready for the year end taxes and thinking about our 2018 goals has left me with a question. In 2018 we want to have as much borrowing power as possible. This in turn would mean making our business and taxes look good for the years past, only problem is we do not like paying high taxes just so our business can look good on paper. So in my opinion there are a couple different ways to do our books and I want anyone’s advice to which way is better then the other. These are just examples on a real estate LLC. That makes $100k a year 1.HeAvy expenses. Profit $100k year, but keep track of every last dollar spent on every move we make and have 90k in expenses. So 10k profit for the year. Will not have to pay a lot of taxes but it does not look good to show the bank you only made 10k profit for the year 2. Lower expenses but heavy depreciation on all assets. Profit $100k year , 20k expenses. So 80k profit for the year. But then do itemized depreciation on all properties and vehicles to total -70k. So 10k profit. Looks good to show the bank the business was 70k more profitable then above, but still only show 10k profit to the IRS because of the depreciation. Now I know in the big picture mixing one and two together to show a loss for the year would be best for tax purposes, when you go to get a loan and show them you are losing money they usually do not want to give you tons more to invest. Does option number 2 look better on paper when you go to a bank to get a loan or do they both look the same?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,105
Posts
5,982
Votes
Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
5,982
Votes |
5,105
Posts
Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
Replied

@Anthony Conway

How can I stay in shape but not watch the calories, because I like pizza and ice cream? Answer this one for me, and I will answer yours. :)

You're right. Obviously, lenders want to see high income. Less expenses = higher income = better loans. However, not deducting expenses that you're eligible for is not only causing you to overpay taxes - it is actually against the IRS rules.

The loophole that you're talking about is to replace some of the deductions with depreciation. It is OK if done correctly, and it might help you, but it depends on the lender. Some of the lenders will add depreciation back when evaluating your income, and others won't. It also depends on what you are depreciating and what is your business model. 

I doubt you can find a good answer without having an accountant go thru your options and your numbers AND also verifying with your future lender that their underwriting will make the desired adjustment for depreciation.

  • Michael Plaks
  • Loading replies...