Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 7 years ago,
Better to claim a lower or higher cost basis on new rental?
I just turned my former primary residence into a rental this year and it's going well. I'm trying to get all my ducks in a row for 2017 tax time. My question is what is the best approach for using my cost basis to claim on taxes going forward? The house was purchased by us in 2007 for $170K. It just appraised a year ago (refi) for $190K, which is close to the assessed value. I could justify $225K or so for a FMV with Zillow and other sites. Is it best to claim as little as possible or as much as possible in terms of depreciation (a function of the cost basis less land / 27.5 years)? Another question is if the recapture tax is still due if I 1031 down the road, or sell within a couple of years (using the living in 2 of the last 5 years rule, which I know may change with the Tax Reform act)?
If I have my head straight, claiming less depreciation now will result in a little more tax each year, but less recapture tax at a 25% rate when I sell. And just the opposite if I claim more depreciation. I estimate my tax bracket to be 15%, or 12% if the new laws pass, which may be the most important data point....
Thanks for your wisdom!
Brian