Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago,

User Stats

82
Posts
22
Votes
Andrew K.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
22
Votes |
82
Posts

Self created liens to protect free and clear RE?

Andrew K.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
Posted

There is a thread in another BP forum debating the merits of keeping your RE mortgaged in order to make the asset seizure less desirable in the event of a lawsuit.  

Assuming that is a strategy you want to pursue, Would it be possible to record a note on your free and clear property for 100% of the market value that has another entity you control as the owner of the note?  In this scenario you are not paying on the note and no money was actually loaned.  It's existence is merely to encumber your RE to protect it from seizure.  Am I suggesting something totally illegal?

Loading replies...