Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 7 years ago on .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70fbd/70fbd2cc453ccbfa62e6b510d522c7659ef35ee8" alt="Bob Malecki's profile image"
- Investor
- Kingston, WA
- 1,451
- Votes |
- 1,723
- Posts
SD IRAs & the DOL Fiduciary Rule for private equity fund managers
Mat Sorensen posted a good article at the link below, and implies that a manager of a Reg D fund might be considered a fiduciary if you run a private fund, or a start-up, or a real estate partnership and if you take investment dollars from a retirement account. He considers that the DOL definition may include the fund sponsor as a fiduciary since the investment docs (PPM, or other) will likely contain information that would be considered “investment advice” and since the manger/sponsor will indirectly be receiving compensation as a part of management of the fund or start-up then the managers are indirectly receiving a fee for providing investment advice and consequently you may be deemed a fiduciary.
Does anyone here have an opinion on this in agreement or to the contrary?