Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 15 years ago,

User Stats

9
Posts
0
Votes
Adam K.
  • Massachusetts
0
Votes |
9
Posts

Title insurance clause in P&S

Adam K.
  • Massachusetts
Posted

Am in the process of purchasing a foreclosed property to rehab and flip and there was one clause that I didn't quite understand so thought I would post for some clarity.

Section: Closing Costs/Concessions
"Purchaser may choose the title insurance company for the closing. If Purchaser agrees to use the title insurance utilized by the Seller's attorney or agent, then Seller agrees to pay for Purchaser's Owner's Title Policy. SELLER WILL NOT BE OBLIGATED TO PAY ANY PORTION OF THE COST OF AN OWNER'S TITLE POLICY IF THE POLICY IS NOT OBTAINED FROM THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY UTILIZED BY SELLER'S ATTORNEY OR AGENT"

So I understand the concept of them paying for versus not paying for. I guess I'm wonderring why I would not just use their insurance company for the title to save some closing costs? Is there a real conflict of interest here and if so, why? The seller in this case is a bank who has foreclosed on the property.

Thanks,
Adam

Loading replies...