Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on .

User Stats

52
Posts
11
Votes
Ben A
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
11
Votes |
52
Posts

$150K MAGI, Rental positive better?

Ben A
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

As someone hits $150,000+ MAGI, rental losses no longer helps for non-RE professional. So in essence, you would actually want a 0 or slight positive in Schedule E as it can boost DTI calculations for another loan application. Am I saying this correctly? Is there a reason why a loss would still be preferrable? Thanks!