Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

8
Posts
3
Votes
Kay Yu
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
3
Votes |
8
Posts

Changing method of calculating depreciation

Kay Yu
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
Posted

Has anybody ever changed depreciation from one year to the next?  I found the following one year too late!  Thank you Brandon Hall, this is great!

https://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2015/04/1...

I have a new rental and for  2015 tax year, I used my "property tax statement" to calculate my depreciable basis.    For the remainder of the 27.5 years, I would like to use another (more favorable) method.

Is there a problem with this?

Do I have to amend 2015 taxes or can I just use the alternate method for the remaining 26.5 years?

Looking at the tax forms.  As long as I document how I've calculate my depreciable basis, I don't see an issue. 

Kay