Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 15 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

198
Posts
45
Votes
Mariah Jeffery
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Cheyenne, WY
45
Votes |
198
Posts

Depreciation of land vs. building

Mariah Jeffery
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Cheyenne, WY
Posted

I bought several properties this year and I'm trying to figure out how to get the highest depreciation deduction possible. I do my taxes myself and plan to continue to do so.

The value of the land, according to the tax assessor, is generally a very high percent of the property's value. Here is an example of a property that I've bought:

Duplex:
Purchase price - $59.5K
Tax assessment - $63K ($26K for land, $37K for building)
Appraisal - $67K total value

The best I can come up with is to take the $26K for land and divide this by the $67K appraised value, to get 38.8% of the value allocated to land. This will allow me to depreciate 61.2% of the $59.5K purchase price, or $36.4K. I'll allocate a few thousand to appliances, which can be depreciated more quickly, and the rest to the building itself. Is there any way I can justify depreciating any more than 61.2% of the purchase price?

I have another property that I purchased for $72.6K, and did not have an appraisal. The tax assessment is $77K with $26K going towards land. This property has two nice houses on it and I'm sure the market value is upwards of $100K. For this one, can I use some comps to determine the total value and still use the $26K as the value of the land?

I'd really appreciate some creative ideas on how to increase my depreciation deductions. Thanks!

~MJ

  • Mariah Jeffery

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

15,747
Posts
10,945
Votes
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
10,945
Votes |
15,747
Posts
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
ModeratorReplied
Do you do your own surgeries as well? I am of the opinion that some tasks are better left to the professionals with proper experience and certifications and a CPA is no different.
The fact that you are asking this question should be a red flag that you need a CPA.

If you are simply trying to avoid the costs of a CPA, it is my opinion that the costs of such a professional are paid for in the deductions you get and the mistakes you avoid rather than going at it alone.

As for cost segregation, that is usually left for commercial properties and not single family or duplex units. Also, keep in mind that the more you depreciate, the more you recapture in the end.

I strongly encourage you to seek professional guidance on this matter from an experienced RE CPA.

Loading replies...