Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
1
Votes
Chris Clemptor
  • Minneapolis, MN
1
Votes |
8
Posts

land value is higher than total amount paid for house

Chris Clemptor
  • Minneapolis, MN
Posted

I'm trying to find out what my depreciation amount is. I just finished reading "Every Landlord's tax deduction guide." I am brand new to land lording and this will be my first time doing taxes with rental income.  I bought my house August of 2011 as a foreclosure for 85,000. I lived in the house alone until this past November I rented out half of the house to a few renters. I have always paid property taxes based on my house being worth 200,000.  Today I looked online for the first time to find what the "land value" is because I know I have to base my depreciation number on the value of the house itself and any material improvement and of course divide everything in two because I still live in half the house. My county has my land value at 90,000 and my house value at 120,000. 

My understanding is I have to use the number that I actually paid for the house plus any material improvement costs that I spent the renters unit. I have spent thousands of dollars on materials but I did 100 percent of the labor of the years. It seems like I could not even use 85 k  as my base number that I bought the house for because a percentage of that 6 years ago must have been considered land cost?

I'm guess investors must run into this issue since they are always buying houses cheaper than what the city says the house is worth.

Any suggestions?

Thanks in advance  

Loading replies...