Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

70
Posts
8
Votes
CL Ziegler
  • Investor
  • Albany, GA
8
Votes |
70
Posts

Expenses, Repairs -vs- Improvements

CL Ziegler
  • Investor
  • Albany, GA
Posted

Hi Everyone,

On my last three tax returns my CPA surprised me by prorating several of my HUGE expenses, citing that they were improvements so the full amount can't be claimed on one year's return. (he diviede them over ten or twelve, I forget) He based this on the amount of the expense; that is how he defined it as an improvement.

Does the amount define which category it goes in? Is that accurate? I feel like I got hammered in the past three years but now I'm rethinking, considering getting a second opinion, perhaps file a revised 1040.

Here is an example:

In two separate units I had the same problem: rotting bathroom floor and some sub-structure. In each case we gutted the bathroom and rebuilt it from the joists up, new sheet rock, floor, shower stall, small vanity, paint etc. If all I did was to restore it to its original usefulness, without adding anything new, then why would that be considered a 'property improvement'? I don't get it.

If you were me based on the info given here, how would you proceed?

Hope someone can offer some insight.

Thanks so much,

Loading replies...