Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

14
Posts
1
Votes
Joe Taylor
  • Bellevue, WA
1
Votes |
14
Posts

Using 26 US Code 190 Expenditure to remove accessibility barriers

Joe Taylor
  • Bellevue, WA
Posted

I'm wondering about using the rule in 26 US Code 190 to expense, instead of capitalize, costs to improve accessibility, whether it's ramps, widening doorways, etc. The code states I have to make an election to make this deduction/expense - how exactly would I do this? Would I just add those costs in with any repairs and include some sort of statement with my tax return?

I have 10+ SFH properties and usually my return is simple enough to use TurboTax. Last year I made some modifications to one to accommodate a disabled tenant and would like to expense those modifications if possible. It looks like this is allowed up to an amount and I just want to be sure I do it properly. Thank you!

Loading replies...