Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago,

User Stats

43
Posts
8
Votes
Brian C.
  • Investor
  • Thousand Oaks, CA
8
Votes |
43
Posts

Optimal Entity structure for Multifamily investing

Brian C.
  • Investor
  • Thousand Oaks, CA
Posted

My partners and I (CA residents) are in the process of evaluating several multifamily properties in Oregon and have questions about the best legal entity structure. 

Our plan is to form an Oregon LLC to purchase the property. In addition, because we are CA residents, my understanding is that we will still be required to file a CA form 568 and pay the $800 minimum LLC tax because we as managers are located in CA.

Is this consistent with everyone's understanding of the rules? Also, do you recommend forming a Oregon LLC as compared to a Delaware, Nevada or Wyoming LLC, etc..?

Thanks!

Loading replies...