Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

204
Posts
33
Votes
Larry Flanagan
  • Investor
  • Midwest, USA
33
Votes |
204
Posts

Providing "services" to SDIRA

Larry Flanagan
  • Investor
  • Midwest, USA
Posted

I was told that I can not provide "services" to my SDIRA like doing repairs to a rental property.  But where do you draw the line?  Can I manage the property?  Can I do the books?  Can I negotiate to buy/sell property?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,180
Posts
1,418
Votes
Justin Windham
  • Banker
  • Nationwide
1,418
Votes |
4,180
Posts
Justin Windham
  • Banker
  • Nationwide
Replied

@Mike Reynolds

If you use the participant loan feature to purchase a property with borrowed funds, the prohibited transaction rules will not apply and you could work on the property. This is because borrowing the funds from the plan makes that money yours and not plan funds, at least until the loan is repaid to the plan. As such, that property would be an investment "outside" of the plan and the plan would not be the owner of the property. The profits would belong to you and not the plan. They could be used as a basis for repaying the loan which would add a small amount of value to the plan. Again, the profits would be yours and would not go back directly to the plan. 

Profits would go back to the plan if you invested the plan funds directly into the property instead of taking the participant loan. Many people feel it's nice to have both options with the Solo 401k, though it is important to understand the pros and cons of each method.

  • Justin Windham
  • Loading replies...