Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago, 09/15/2016

User Stats

53
Posts
14
Votes
Ben Williams
  • Real Estate Investor/Agent and Web Developer
  • Flower Mound, TX
14
Votes |
53
Posts

Polling on "Due on Sale" being enforced after transfer to LLC

Ben Williams
  • Real Estate Investor/Agent and Web Developer
  • Flower Mound, TX
Posted

Taking an informal Poll here on the "due on sale clause" enforcement. 

Wondering what people's experiences have been when purchasing a property secured by a loan under the individual's name, then shortly after transferred to another entity controlled by the same individual (such as an LLC with individual as owner).

If no interruption of complete payments, has anyone had their loan called due? If yes, then were there any special or unusual circumstances? What advantage would a bank have in doing this since the same person is still responsible for the loan and all the bank would do would risk a foreclosure, costing the bank money? 

Loading replies...