Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

57
Posts
16
Votes
Scott Taylor
  • Investor
  • Oakland, CA
16
Votes |
57
Posts

Closing gone wrong...legal proceedings to follow?

Scott Taylor
  • Investor
  • Oakland, CA
Posted

I was about 5 days from closing on my first place (an up/down duplex + cottage)...when the lenders (a typical residential / investment lender) said he would not fund the transaction...because the appraisal came back saying that it was a "raised mobile home" - and they don't fund mobile homes.

It wasn't obvious that this was a mobile home by sight - apparently it was just the foundation of the mobile home that was used and then was re-finished (new siding, new roof, etc).  The appraiser found the hud tag on the i-beams when he did his inspection.

This was never disclosed either before or after signing the purchase & sale agreement and nothing was said about it in the building inspection.

So a few questions:

1.  Does it still make sense to go through with this transaction? The seller's agent said he had a lender that would lend on it.  But from what I've read, there's basically no market for it because most lenders will not lend against it (so it will make it very hard to resell in the future).

2. I'll get my deposit back, but I have at least $2k in other fees (appraisal, home inspection, legal, etc).  Since it seems like the seller obviously knew about this and never disclosed it - and the seller's agent at the very best was ignorant about it - does it make sense to sue to recoup these losses? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,096
Posts
374
Votes
Mark Brogan
  • Investor
  • Roanoke, VA
374
Votes |
1,096
Posts
Mark Brogan
  • Investor
  • Roanoke, VA
Replied

if you are a buy and hold investor I don't know why you would care as long as it cash flows well every month @Scott Taylor

You should never buy looking for appreciation 

But if that is one of the reasons you are buying when you sell just finance it for end buyer and get appreciation that way

Loading replies...