Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

48
Posts
3
Votes
Richard Boyd
  • Property Manager
  • Oneonta, NY
3
Votes |
48
Posts

27.5 year rule

Richard Boyd
  • Property Manager
  • Oneonta, NY
Posted

Hi guys,

I read all the time about putting your home into your tax write offs over 27.5 years, just a couple of questions...

How long from when I buy it must it begin to be filled into my taxes? If there is even a limit.

Also, since my home value fluctuates so much, for example, 800k one year to 1.5 mil over the next few years... How is the value placed on the tax? Surely it's not the worth the value every year, right? Since it would be more every year, presumably... for example, you wouldn’t divide 800k into 27.5 one year and 1.5 mil into 26.5 the next year, correct? I’m just a little confused about this.

Loading replies...