Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2,714
Posts
1,554
Votes
Lynn McGeein
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Virginia Beach, VA
1,554
Votes |
2,714
Posts

Wow! Massachusetts is tough...

Lynn McGeein
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Virginia Beach, VA
Posted

http://nationalmortgageprofessional.com/news/58511...

So, basically, you have to rent to people with families (we all know this), but in Massachusetts, if their children are under 6, you must pay for lead remediation, where you don't if they are over?  I'd understand it if you had to remediate no matter what so you actually know cost of doing business right away, upfront, but randomly getting stuck with paying for lead remediation randomly based on the applicant just seems wacko to me.    

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,269
Posts
2,367
Votes
Ann Bellamy
  • Lender
  • Tyngsboro, MA
2,367
Votes |
3,269
Posts
Ann Bellamy
  • Lender
  • Tyngsboro, MA
Replied

Yup, it is definitely wacko.  And it is in fact the case.  That is just one of the many MA tenant friendly laws.  The courts make up the rules as they go along.  If they don't like the statute and it's not in the tenant's favor, they will "interpret" it in a manner that delivers the desired result.  

So you don't have to delead, but if a family with a 5 year old wants to move in, you must.  So you might as well.

In addition, recently a tenant was able to mount a defense against eviction because the landlord failed to return $3.96 in interest to the tenant.  So the eviction was overturned.  Gotta love the People's Republic of Massachusetts.  I'm not sure California can compete.

Loading replies...