Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Andy Lam
  • Northville, MI
0
Votes |
4
Posts

Rental property placed into service a second time

Andy Lam
  • Northville, MI
Posted

I have a rental property (a condo) that was placed into service 2004. I started taking the 27.5yr depreciation that year, but stopped in 2010 when it became my primary residence. However, in 2015, I placed it into service again.

For talking purposes, let's assume I started with $200,000 in 2004, and ended with an adjusted basis of $165,000 in 2010. Starting 2015, do I depreciate the $165,000 for the remaining 21.5yrs of the original recovery period, or do I start new at 27.5 yrs again?

Also, can I add improvements I made to the condo during 2010-2015, when it was my primary residence, to the $165,000 adjusted basis?

I couldn't find information on this topic where a rental property is placed into service a second time. Thanks!

Loading replies...