Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago, 12/31/2015

Account Closed
  • Frederick, MD
256
Votes |
654
Posts

Investor Discrimination - Definition of Owner

Account Closed
  • Frederick, MD
Posted

By virtue of SUBTITLE 4. HOME IMPROVEMENT GUARANTY FUND Md. BUSINESS REGULATION Code Ann. § 8-405, (f) (2) (ii), "owners" who own more than three residences or dwelling places are denied access to make a claim against the Guaranty Fund.

To me, this seems prejudicial to the "owner" as well as to the contractors who pay into a fund for which they receive no value when working with those disqualified, and does little to encourage those disqualified to use licensed contractors.  That said, this post seeks to solicit feedback from the legal community here at BP regarding the definition of "owner". 

I've been asked by multiple investors if that exclusion pertains to ownership as recorded with the SDAT (and in identical name only) or if ownership carries over to their membership in LLC(s).

Feedback is appreciated, thank you!

Loading replies...