Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago,

User Stats

25
Posts
8
Votes
Mustafa Abdulali
  • Investor
  • Naples, FL
8
Votes |
25
Posts

How enforceable are items in the "additional items" section?

Mustafa Abdulali
  • Investor
  • Naples, FL
Posted

I’m interested in purchasing a home and had my agent put into the contract that the following items must be either repaired or a credit given for repairs (we noticed these items during the first showing):

"Contingent on:

receipt of initial mold report from H2O no later than 3 days after effective date

items notably understood for repair or credit

sliders do not work, do not lock must operate properly

hot water heater has leak

screen lanai has sections of screen not secured in place"

We are using a standard Florida Realtors and Florida Bar approved contract.  It is not a AS-IS contract.

My interpretation is that the items listed MUST be either repaired or credit given.


My agent is insisting that the additional terms don’t mean the seller has to fix or credit anything, instead it is an understanding that after the inspection we will be issuing an inspection notice asking for a credit/repair, which the sellers can then accept or decline. I’ve inserted her comments below:

“There is nothing that says they are absolutely giving you anything.
It was inserted as part of an understanding of what we will be coming back with, opening accepting the price...

You need to complete the inspection to fully see what else is a concern before you ask for credits or repairs. It’s called an inspection notice… you will want to include the cost to cure/repair those items so we can present a price… ok”

My point is that if they are not going to fix the items, which she believes they won't, why would I go through the cost of having an inspection done?  Not fixing the items, at this particular price point, would be a deal breaker for me.

My limited understanding of tort law indicates that the contract is binding and that the Inspection notice is an addendum that can be bargained over.  If I asked for something else, outside of the items in the original contract, then the sellers could decline to fix/credit those but the original terms of the contract are enforceable.

I would appreciate any insight the forum can provide, especially if you are Florida real estate lawyer.  I do need to initial the counter offer tomorrow.

Thanks!

Loading replies...