Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Homeowner
  • Signal Hill, CA
70
Votes |
521
Posts

Landlords Preferring Sec 8

Account Closed
  • Homeowner
  • Signal Hill, CA
Posted

have started seeing more and more landlords in socal suburbs actually declaring in ads that they prefer or give 'priority' to sec 8 applicants.

considering sec 8 is a 'program' providing an need-based housing voucher deemed countable as 'income'* for 'low-income residents', would preferring applicants of a type of income (in this case, the low-income housing voucher program called section 8) be in violation of FHA act or other federal or state (in my case, CA) statutes?

* https://www.nmhc.org/uploadedFiles/Articles/Issue_...

Loading replies...