Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 7 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

12
Posts
8
Votes
Joshua Awodele
  • Investor
  • Stamford, CT
8
Votes |
12
Posts

Connecticut Section 168k Limitations

Joshua Awodele
  • Investor
  • Stamford, CT
Posted

Just found out that Connecticut disallows section 168k & section 179 bonus depreciation. For reference, see: https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/drs/publications/ocg/ocg5bonus...

Is there an exemption to this rule or can bonus depreciation from a cost segregation study be applied via a different IRC code? Or any other tax strategy?

Thank you BP Nation.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

107
Posts
110
Votes
Benjamin Weinhart
  • Accountant
  • Cincinnati OH 45245, USA
110
Votes |
107
Posts
Benjamin Weinhart
  • Accountant
  • Cincinnati OH 45245, USA
Replied
Quote from @Joshua Awodele:
Quote from @Benjamin Weinhart:

No, this is common for states to not follow the federal guidelines when it comes to bonus depreciation, there is no exemption or other work-around. You will have a mismatch between depreciation allowed from the federal & state level for the entire life of the property which can create some added administrative burden for some.

Just in case there is confusion by the way, you are still allowed to take bonus depreciation under your federal return, just not for the state of Connecticut (among some others if others are reading. It's a case-by-case basis)

 Thank you Benjamin. I wonder what the depreciation schedule for Connecticut will look like then. If they'll disallow you claiming a big chunk at once, in what way are you allowed to take depreciation for now and future years?

 I don't work in Connecticut enough to know this answer off-hand but a large majority of states that opt-out of bonus depreciation effectively pretend it doesn't exist. This means you would still get the 200% MACRS on most/all assets that would otherwise be subject to bonus depreciation.

Funnily enough, Ohio is not one of these states for my tax preparer friends who are looking for another reason not to work with Ohio :) (I live/work in Ohio, it's a wacky time). They instead use an alternative method separate from both of the mentioned methods.

business profile image
Ice Accounting & CPA, LLC
5.0 stars
2 Reviews

Loading replies...