Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 8 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Aashrit Luthra
0
Votes |
1
Posts

Negative Cash Flow Impact on W2 Income Taxes

Aashrit Luthra
Posted

Hi all. 


I'm looking to buy a new construction home in CA for $750,000 as an investment property (around 8% interest rate) with 20% down. The rent I can expect is $3200. This would surely put me in negative cash flow of $2000/month. I'm relying on appreciation of the house to make up for it in the long-term. I'm assuming appreciation rate of 6% in Manteca, CA. First of all, does this even sound like a good investment strategy (going into negative cash flow)? How do investors currently invest in this market when interest rates are so high then?

Secondly, I make above $150,000 / year in my w2 job. Can I use this negative cash flow as property losses every year to reduce my taxable income, or not since I make over $150,000? Does it make sense to rely on tax implications / benefits to justify this as a good investment?


Thirdly, if the losses can only get carried forward to selling time when I realize capital gains, then isn't there the rule (i forget the name) which allows you to sell, and buy another house within few months, and hence you don't have to pay any capital gains on the first house? If that's true, then what benefit does the property loss from the previous years even provide (if you can just avoid capital gain by buying another house immeditately)?

Loading replies...