Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago,

User Stats

94
Posts
32
Votes
Alex U.
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
32
Votes |
94
Posts

Umbrella Insurance vs Wyoming Holding company holding California LLC

Alex U.
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

For your buy and hold properties, to my knowledge there are 2 predominant strategies.

1. Keep properties in your name or in a trust, get $1M worth of liability insurance for a few hundred dollars and rent out the units

2. Create a (Wyoming/NV/RI holding company), create a California LLC put properties into LLc. Keep primary in your trust. Put the holding company in the trust.

Option #1 avoids, the franchise fee in California $800/year, plus $20/month RA fee for Wyoming.

If someone has a couple of properties, what's the best way to operate?  Pros and Cons of each strategy.

Loading replies...