Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

68
Posts
28
Votes
Kat Hughes
28
Votes |
68
Posts

capital gains exemption on a primary residence that is owned inside a DST?

Kat Hughes
Posted

Hello!


My husband and I own a multi family property in Los Angeles.  The front house is 3bed/2bath with a converted garage and the back is a duplex, 2bed/1.5 bath each that are both tenant occupied.  We want to sell the property and we've lived 2 out of the last 5 years to technically be able to claim capital gains exemption for the primary residence part of the property.  I understand we'll have to pay taxes on the investment portion of the sale.  

However, our property is in a DST - Delaware Statutory Trust.

My CPA said that this type of trust is a separate legal entity apart from ourselves as a beneficiary. Even though we are the ultimate beneficiary of the Trust, the ownership of the property is with the Trust the IRS doesn't see us as the owners of the property.  She said that I cannot claim the principal residence exclusion because I didn’t own the property.  

We wanted to do a 1031 exchange for the investment part of the sale but keep the other funds from the primary residence part of the sale because we were thinking we could do a capital gains exemption.


We feel very stuck and when we did the DST, I thought I had gone over all the details of what a DST would mean for us but unfortunately, the company I did it with didn't really disclose this information. I know I should have done more due diligence but being new at that time (this was years ago) to investing, perhaps we didn't know what questions to ask. I know I asked what it would look like if we sold our house later and they said it's an easy process and our property being in a DST won't be an issue.

Any thoughts or advice on this? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

68
Posts
28
Votes
Kat Hughes
28
Votes |
68
Posts
Kat Hughes
Replied
Quote from @Dave Foster:

@Kat Hughes, Been noodling this since we talked. And I realize that DSTs are different animals than regular revocable living trusts. Most DSTs will file a tax return and you will get a 1065 partnership report to file on your tax return. But they have still been blessed by the IRS to be the equivalent of direct ownership for purposes of 1031. Your DST was simply set up to own the property because it is in CA and the Franchise tax board is ruthless about charging for LLCs. The primary side of things might be different.

But when you just said it is still reported on your personal tax return that tells me that it might be a disregarded entity. Meaning that the IRS looks through the DST structure and sees that you are the real taxpayer for the property. And if you're the real taxpayer for the property and the property has been reported on your tax return for more than the 2/5 years then it doesn't matter whose name the deed is in. The same tax return/taxpayer has been reporting it and living in it . It should qualify. You could sell as the DST, or you could quitclaim and sell as yourself. It doesn't change the taxpayer. It doesn't change how long that taxpayer has lived in the property. It certainly doesn't change your ability to do a 1031 on part. And I can't see how it should impact your ability to do a

The DSTs that people invest in through 1031 exchanges all file their own tax return.  So your's is a curious case (and probably shared by more than a few Californians).  It would be worth a second opinion from an accountant.


 thanks Dave, will also forward this to my CPA.  After lots of talking, my CPA thinks it's doable to take that cap gains exemption on the residence part of the sale.  Ideally, this is really what we want.  We'd like to keep the cash for the portion that's tax exempt, and the portion that's not, we'll do the 1031 exchange.  

Loading replies...